Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2018 May 1;67:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.04.009

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Average 3D meshes for each group of morphology variability. Eight subgroups of condylar morphology variability are shown in the top row. For the neural network training data, the overgrowth group was not included and two subgroups with the most severe phenotypes of bone destruction were merged.