Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Care. 2017 Oct 25;30(6):688–695. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1394434

Table 3.

McNemar’s test of HIV viral load changes baseline to follow-up.

HT
HIV viral load
Follow-up < log 2.0 Follow-up ≥ log 2.0 P Value
Baseline < log 2.0 11 (73%) 4 (27%) .21
Baseline ≥ log 2.0 3 (27%) 8 (73%)
MBSR
HIV viral load Follow-up < log 2.0 Follow-up ≥ log 2.0 P Value

Baseline < log 2.0 6 (86%) 1 (14%) .04a
Baseline ≥ log 2.0 8 (44%) 10 (56%)
a

Significant difference between the quadrants representing change between time points, i.e., there is a greater likelihood that those in MBSR arm who had a high baseline viral load (VL) then had a low VL at 3-month follow-up (44% of those with high baseline VL) and/or there is a lower likelihood that those in the MBSR arm who had a low baseline VL then had a high VL at follow-up (14%).