Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;13(3):259–263. doi: 10.1177/1558944717701241

Table 1.

Recent Comparative Analyses Regarding Surgical Site Infection in Hand Surgery.

Study Design (level of evidence) Cases Procedure Infection rate Surgical site infection associations
Harness et al28 Retrospective, multicenter (III) 2336 CTR Antibiotic prophylaxis vs control:
SSI: 0.4% vs 0.7% (P = .354)
DI: 0.1% vs 0.2% (P = 1)
No association with sex, age, or DM
Bykowski et al8 Retrospective, single-center (III) 6095 CTR Antibiotic prophylaxis vs control:
0.54% vs 0.26% (P > .05)
Infection associated with tobacco, DM, and longer operative time
Prophylactic antibiotic did not prevent SSI in males, tobacco users, or for those with longer operative times
Tosti et al51 Retrospective, multicenter (III) 600 CTR, DQR, TFR, and ME Antibiotic prophylaxis vs control:
0.47% vs 0.77% (P = 1)
No association with DM and tobacco

Note. CTR = carpal tunnel release; SSI = surgical site infection; DI = deep infection; DM = diabetes mellitus; DQR = De Quervain release; TFR = trigger finger release; ME = mass excision.