Table 2. Comparison of the results of mWH analysis [equation (16)] with mean domain size from the WPPM of Figs. 4, 6 and 7, and parameter 
with B/A from WPPM [cf. equations (12) and (15)].
| Mean domain size 〈D〉 (nm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern | mWH | WPPM | C 2 | C 3 | WPPM B/A | |
| 28bm11 | 10.0 (0.5) | 8.0 (0.1) | 0.0013 | 1.87 | 2.12 | |
| 43ID22 | 8.8 (0.4) | 8.6 (0.1) | 0.0013 | 2.02 | 2.33 | |
| 13BL01C2 | 12.3 (1.0) | 10.1 (0.9) | 0.0018 | 1.80 | 2.01 | |
| 4BL01C2† | 15.4 (0.6) | 9.9 (3.3) | 0.0022 | 1.62 | 1.60 | |
| 19MCX | 10.6 (0.7) | 9.3 (0.8) | 0.0016 | 1.81 | 2.01 | |
| 4CoKα1 | 13.0 (0.2) | 9.2 (0.13) | 0.0024 | 2.07 | 2.11 | |
| 6CuKα | 12.3 (0.3) | 9.0 (2.0) | 0.0022 | 1.98 | 2.03 | |
| 4CuKα | 14.7 (0.3) | 12.5 (3.8) | 0.0025 | 1.86 | 1.87 | |
| 5CuKα | 12.4 (0.3) | 8.7 (0.3) | 0.0021 | 1.76 | 1.95 | |
| 17MoKα1 | 10.8 (0.7) | 9.5 (1.2) | 0.0016 | 1.88 | 2.08 | |
| 6MCuKα | 12.1 (0.4) | 9.1(1.6) | 0.0022 | 1.96 | 1.79 | |
| 8WB | 9.9 (2.0) | 10.4(5.0) | 0.0018 | 2.23 | 1.41 | |
†
σ2 in equation (9) (variance of lognormal distribution) was fixed during WPPM owing to instability of the fit with just four peaks on a relatively high background.