Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;118(11):1425–1433. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0082-1

Table 1.

Patient baseline characteristics in the AML and solid tumour dose-escalation studies

AML dose-escalation study n= 32 Solid tumour dose-escalation study n= 35
Age, years
  Median 65 65
  Range 18–89 28–81
Sex
  Male 21 (65.6) 17 (48.6)
  Female 11 (34.4) 18 (51.5)
Race
  White 26 (81.3) 19 (54.3)
  Asian 3 (9.4) 16 (45.7)
  Other 3 (9.4) 0
Extent of disease at baseline
  Locally advanced NA 13 (37.1)
  Metastatic NA 31 (88.6)
Disease under study
  Refractory AML (primary only) 21 (65.6) NA
  First relapse 3 (9.4) NA
  Second relapse 4 (12.5) NA
  Third or further relapse 4 (12.5) NA
ECOG PS
  0 6 (18.8) 16 (47.1)
  1 21 (65.6) 18 (52.9)
  2 5 (15.6) 0
Prior therapy
  Surgery NA 27 (77.1)
  Radiotherapy 2 (6.3) 35 (100)
  Chemotherapy, n (%), median 32 (100), 4.0 34 (97.1), NA
  Immuno-/hormonal therapy NA 6 (17.1)
  Other systemic anticancer therapya 2 (6.3) 0
  Stem cell transplant 5 (15.6) NA
Molecular mutation status
  FLT3
    Detected 3 (9.4) NA
    Not detected 12 (37.5) NA
    Unknown 17 (53.1) NA
  NPM1
    Detected 0 NA
    Not detected 12 (37.5) NA
    Unknown 20 (62.5) NA
Cytogenetics
  Normal 14 (43.8) NA
  t (8:21) 1 (3.1) NA
  Inv 16 or t (16:16) 1 (3.1) NA
  Abnormalities of 5 and/or 7 7 (21.9) NA
  Complex (>3 abnormalities) 8 (25.0) NA
  Other 14 (43.8) NA

Data are n (%) unless otherwise stated.

AML acute myeloid leukaemia, ECOG PS Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group Performance Status, FLT3 FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3, NA not applicable, NPM1 nucleophosmin.

aDetails of ‘other systemic anticancer prior therapy’ are not known