Table 4.

Sleep (SWS and N2) classification rates.

Sleep Stage	Participant	The start of the window (ms)	CCR ± SD		p-value
			Classifier	Random Classifier
SWS	1	50	0.28 ± 0.02	0.21 ± 0.02	0.004
	2	550	0.24 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.01	0.002
	3	400	0.25 ± 0.02	0.19 ± 0.02	0.017
	4	1	0.27 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.01	<0.001
	5	1	0.24 ± 0.02	0.19 ± 0.02	0.018
	6	1	0.28 ± 0.01	0.21 ± 0.02	<0.001
	7	450	0.21 ± 0.02	0.19 ± 0.02	0.040
	8	450	0.24 ± 0.02	0.19 ± 0.02	0.004
	9	200	0.26 ± 0.01	0.21 ± 0.01	<0.001
	10	300	0.25 ± 0.01	0.21 ± 0.02	0.016
	11	550	0.22 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.01	0.030
	12	550	0.23 ± 0.01	0.19 ± 0.02	<0.001
	13	500	0.23 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.1	0.02
	14	100	0.30 ± 0.02	0.20 ± 0.03	0.001
	15	100	0.25 ± 0.02	0.20 ± 0.03	0.011
N2	1	No data
	2	500	0.21 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.070†
	3	500	0.22 ± 0.02	0.21 ± 0.01	0.043
	4	500	0.22 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.004
	5	50	0.21 ± 0.01	0.19 ± 0.01	<0.001
	6	80	0.19 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.060†
	7	100	0.18 ± 0.01	0.21 ± 0.01	<0.001†
	8	50	0.21 ± 0.02	0.20 ± 0.01	0.039
	9	110	0.20 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.131†
	10	110	0.16 ± 0.02	0.18 ± 0.03	<0.001†
	11	80	0.20 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.245†
	12	550	0.21 ± 0.02	0.19 ± 0.02	0.044
	13	450	0.21 ± 0.02	0.20 ± 0.02	0.316†
	14	450	0.22 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.085†
	15	550	0.21 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02	0.241†

Statistical comparisons between the mean correct classification rate (CCR) of the TMR cued reactivations during sleep (SWS and N2) and the CCR of a random classifier. The mean and standard deviation of the classifier's CCR were calculated after sampling the data (50%) 1000 times. For the random classifier, the class-labels were randomly shuffled before sampling. The start of the window corresponds to the sample index at which the optimal window for voting was chosen (see the materials and methods section). Cases in which no above chance classifier was found are indicated by ‘†’.