Table 5.

The correlation between the CCR and the repetitions during SWS and N2.

Participant	SWS			N2
	r	p-value		r	p-value
1	−0.16	0.001	↓*	No Data
2	−0.35	<0.001	↓*	−0.21	<0.001	↓*†
3	−0.49	<0.001	↓*	0.69	<0.001	↑*
4	−0.85	<0.001	↓*	−0.25	<0.001	↓*
5	−0.43	<0.001	↓*	0.59	<0.001	↑*
6	−0.36	<0.001	↓*	0.41	<0.001	↑*†
7	−0.68	<0.001	↓*	−0.75	<0.001	↓*†
8	0.34	<0.001	↑*	−0.08	0.054	↓
9	−0.50	<0.001	↓*	−0.16	<0.001	↓*†
10	0.02	0.588	↑	−0.72	<0.001	↓*†
11	−0.67	<0.001	↓*	0.56	<0.001	↑*†
12	−0.41	<0.001	↓*	−0.76	<0.001	↓*
13	−0.79	<0.001	↓*	−0.85	<0.001	↓*†
14	−0.62	<0.001	↓*	−0.68	<0.001	↓*†
15	−0.12	0.004	↓*	−0.40	<0.001	↓*†

The arrows indicate the direction (positive or negative) of the correlations, ‘*’ significant correlations (p < 0.05), and ‘†’ classifier is not above chance.