Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;9:2191. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04306-5

Table 1.

Optimization of polysulfide reagentsa,b

graphic file with name 41467_2018_4306_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry CuSO4 (mol%) Ligand (mol%) PhI(OPiv)2 (equiv) Temp (°C) Time (h) Yields (%)
1c 10 bpy (10) 2.5 25 11 31
2d 10 bpy (10) 2.5 25 11 ND
3 10 bpy/ phen (10) 2.5 25 11 50/53
4 10 L1 (10) 2.5 25 11 77
5 10 L2/L3/L4 (10) 2.5 25 11 70/63/68
6 10 L1 (10) 2.5 20 13 86
7 5 L1 (10) 2.5 20 13 86
8 2.5 L1 (10) 2.5 20 13 79
9 5 L1 (5) 2.5 20 13 76
10 5 L1 (10) 2.2 20 13 88
11 5 L1 (10) 1.9 20 13 65
graphic file with name 41467_2018_4306_Figb_HTML.gif

aConditions: 1d (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), CuSO4·5H2O, Ligand, Li2CO3 and PhI(OPiv)2 were added to MeOH (2 mL) at 20 °C for 13 h

bIsolated yields

cPhI(OAc)2 was instead of PhI(OPiv)2

dPhI(OTFA)2 was instead of PhI(OPiv)2