Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 21;48(3):421–434. doi: 10.1177/0022042618770393

Table 2.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Predicting Type of Marijuana Use.

Recreational users versus nonusers
Medical users versus nonusers
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Focal variables
 Religious attendance 0.87*** 0.86*** 0.87*** 0.87*** 0.83*** 0.87***
 Religious salience 0.77*** 0.77*** 0.75*** 0.80*** 0.80*** 0.79***
Control variables
 Male 1.37*** 1.37*** 1.37*** 1.72*** 1.73*** 1.72***
 Black 1.12** 1.12** 1.12** 1.01 1.00 1.01
 Hispanic 0.61*** 0.61*** 0.61*** 0.70** 0.69** 0.70**
 Asian 0.36*** 0.36*** 0.36*** 0.33*** 0.33*** 0.33***
 Other race 1.26*** 1.26*** 1.26*** 1.60*** 1.60 1.60***
 18-29 3.61*** 3.62*** 3.64*** 2.44*** 2.46*** 2.45***
 30-49 2.02*** 2.02*** 2.03*** 2.00*** 2.00*** 2.00***
 Less than high school 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.94
 High school 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.25 1.24 1.25
 Some college 1.16*** 1.16*** 1.16*** 1.69*** 1.68*** 1.69***
 Widowed 0.88 0.87 0.87 1.34 1.32 1.34
 Divorced or separated 1.81*** 1.81*** 1.81*** 2.51*** 2.50*** 2.51***
 Never married 2.34*** 2.34*** 2.34*** 1.97*** 1.97*** 1.97***
 Employed part-time 1.17*** 1.17*** 1.17*** 1.19 1.19 1.19
 Unemployed 1.24*** 1.24*** 1.24*** 1.76*** 1.76*** 1.76***
 Not in labor force 0.83*** 0.83*** 0.83*** 1.38** 1.38** 1.38**
 Suburban 0.91** 0.91** 0.91** 0.84* 0.84* 0.84*
 Rural 0.80*** 0.80** 0.80*** 0.73* 0.73* 0.73*
 Poor health 1.17** 1.01 0.71** 2.27*** 1.44* 1.77*
 State law 1.28*** 1.28*** 1.28*** 3.45*** 3.43*** 3.45***
Interaction terms
 Religious Attendance × Poor Health 1.07* 1.24***
 Religious Salience × Poor Health 1.22*** 1.10

Note. N = 41,517. Shown are odds ratios.

*

p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.