Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 5;18:638. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4465-8

Table 5.

Confusion matrix for PH2 dataset

Confusion Matrix: Proposed features fusion and selection
Class Tested images Melanoma Benign Caricinoma
Melanoma 20 92.5% 7.5%
Benign 40 2.5% 97.5%
Caricinoma 40 100%
Confusion matrix: Harlick features
Class Total Images Melanoma Benign Caricinoma
Melanoma 20 57.5% 35% 7.5%
Benign 40 8.8% 68.8% 22.5%
Caricinoma 40 3.8% 13.8% 82.5%
Confusion matrix: HOG features
Class Total Images Melanoma Benign Caricinoma
Melanoma 20 70% 30% -
Benign 40 10% 88.8% 1.3%
Caricinoma 40 - - 100%
Confusion matrix: Color features
Class Total Images Melanoma Benign Caricinoma
Melanoma 20 95% 5.0% -
Benign 40 3.8% 95% 1.3%
Caricinoma 40 1.3% 5.0% 93.8%