Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 10;13(6):850–857. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08450817

Table 2.

Outcomes of a clinical trial comparing family consultation to treatment as usual among patients with ESKD discharged from an urban hospital

Variable Family Consultation Treatment as Usual OR 95% CI P
Intent-to-treat analyses (n=60) (n=60)
 30-d readmissiona 0.54 0.23 to 1.24 0.15
  Yes 12 (20.0%) 19 (31.7%)
  No 48 (80.0%) 41 (68.3%)
 30-d any return visit 0.53 0.25 to 1.11 0.09
  Yes 19 (31.7%) 28 (46.7%)
  No 41 (68.3%) 32 (53.3%)
 6-mo readmission 0.93 0.44 to 1.96 0.85
  Yes 38 (63.3%) 39 (65.0%)
  No 22 (36.7%) 21 (35.0%)
 6-mo any return visit 0.75 0.32 to 1.77 0.51
  Yes 45 (75.0%) 48 (80.0%)
  No 15 (25.0%) 12 (20.0%)
Per-protocol analyses (n=57) (n=60)
 30-d readmission 0.46 0.19 to 1.10 0.08
  Yes 10 (17.5%) 19 (31.7%)
  No 47 (82.5%) 41 (68.3%)
 30-d any return visit 0.45 0.21 to 0.96 0.04
  Yes 16 (28.1%) 28 (46.7%)
  No 41 (71.9%) 32 (53.3%)
 6-mo readmission 0.86 0.40 to 1.82 0.69
  Yes 35 (61.4%) 39 (65.0%)
  No 22 (38.6%) 21 (35.0%)
 6-mo any return visit 0.70 0.30 to 1.66 0.42
  Yes 42 (73.7%) 48 (80.0%)
  No 15 (25.0%) 12 (20.0%)

Data are presented as n (%). OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a

Prespecified primary study outcome at the primary endpoint (30 d) in primary analyses (intent-to-treat). All other outcomes, endpoint, and analyses are secondary.