Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 9;13(6):952–961. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10390917

Table 2.

Observational studies examining outcomes after parathyroidectomy in patients on dialysis

Study Country Sample Size, PTx/Medical Treatment Mean Age, yr Women, % Dialysis Duration, mo Mean Duration of Follow-Up, mo Study Period Mean Serum iPTH, pg/ml Mortality Difference with PTx
Kestenbaum et al., 2004 (56) United States 4558/4558 47.6 57.5 40.2 36 1994–2001 Not reported Short-term ↑ death <90 d after PTx; long-term ↓ all-cause death 15%
Sharma et al., 2012 (57) United States 150/1044 42.0 53.0 86.4 43.2 1993–2009 1770.0 ↓ All-cause death 37%, ↓ CV death 33%
Goldenstein et al., 2013 (58) Brazil 123/128 48.0 45.7 72.0 23 2005–2012 1455.1 ↓ All-cause death 57%
Ivarsson et al., 2015 (59) Sweden 423/1234 55.8 50.4 Not reported 56.3 1991–2009 Not reported ↓ All-cause death 20%
Komaba et al., 2015 (51) Japan 4428/4428 59.2 44.3 150.5 12 2004–2005 382.5 ↓ All-cause death 34%, ↓ CV death 41%

A consistent association with improved survival was observed in the dialysis population across studies. PTx, parathyroidectomy; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone level; CV, cardiovascular.