Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Cell. 2012 Sep 11;22(3):373–388. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.07.016

Figure 3. Docetaxel Exposure Selects for Pre-Existing Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells.

Figure 3

(A) Working hypotheses; transition versus enrichment-selection induced by Docetaxel.

(B) Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry quantification of CK18 and CK19 expression in DU145 and 22Rv1. White arrows point to cells with a CK phenotype.

(C) Flow cytometry analysis of DU145-pCK19-GFP and 22Rv1-pCK19-GFP treated with Docetaxel (72 hr).

(D) Colony formation assay and quantification of sorted DU145-pCK19-GFP and 22Rv1-pCK19-GFP cells cultured with Docetaxel, 10 and 50 nM respectively, for 72 hr, or DMSO.

(E) Time-lapse microscopy of DU145-pCK19-GFP treated with Docetaxel. Dotted area shows a CK19/GFP cell.

(F) Immunoblots of GFP and Docetaxel-resistance markers in DU145-pCK19-GFP and 22Rv1-pCK19-GFP sorted cells, as well as in unsorted DU145-pCK19-GFP and 22Rv1-pCK19-GFP cells exposed to Docetaxel (72 hr) at the same concentrations as in (D).

(G) Colony formation assays and quantification of DU145-pCK19-GFP and 22Rv1-pCK19-GFP sorted cells cultured with or without Mitoxantrone 125 and 500 nM, Cisplatin 5 and 2.5 μM, and Vinorelbine 500 and 750 nM, respectively (all 72 hr). Data is represented as means ± SD of triplicate experiments. *p < 0.0001.

See also Figure S3 and Movies S1 and S2.