Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 19;135(6):1580–1587. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2040

Table 1.

Estimated Nodule VDT by Slice Thickness and Various Observed Nodule Growth Patterns*

Growth, d
Patterns From 4–5 mm From 5–6 mm From 4–6 mm From 4–8 mm From 9–10 mm
Observed nodule diameter growth over 90 d
 VDT median 93 114 51 30 197
 VDT 95% CI
  0.625/1.25 mm 86–102 106–124 49–53 29–31 189–206
  2.50 mm 65–159 81–183 42–64 27–33 163–248
  5.00 mm 59–190 76–215 40–68 26–34 157–264
Observed nodule diameter growth over 180 d
 VDT median 186 228 103 60 395
 VDT 95% CI
  0.625/1.25 mm 171–205 211–248 98–107 59–61 378–413
  2.50 mm 128–314 163–367 84–128 54–67 326–497
  5.00 mm 119–380 153–430 80–136 52–68 313–529
Observed nodule diameter growth over 360 d
 VDT median 373 457 205 120 789
 VDT 95% CI
  0.625/1.25mm 342–409 422–496 197–214 117–123 756–826
  2.50 mm 258–631 325–732 167–257 107–134 653–994
  5.00 mm 239–760 305–853 159–272 104–137 626–1,061
*

Note that the estimated VDT medians are equal, what would be predicted by the modification of Lindell et al 12 of the tumor growth model of Schwartz 13 using the diameters and times of interest.