Table 2.
Patient no. | D-Ser | Rs L-Ser |
Patient no. | D-Ser | NRs L-Ser |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.77 | 34.6 | 9 | 5.44 | 273.6 |
2 | 2.86 | 37.0 | 10 | 5.98 | 325.4 |
3 | 2.78 | 40.4 | 11 | 4.86 | 345.1 |
4 | 3.18 | 40.1 | 12 | 5.15 | 282.6 |
5 | 2.69 | 46.5 | 13 | 5.01 | 229.8 |
6 | 3.07 | 48.3 | 14 | 4.29 | 242.9 |
7 | 3.22 | 50.6 | 15 | 4.67 | 237.7 |
8 | 3.57 | 232.1 | 16 | 3.79 | 217.8 |
17 | 5.05 | 228.3 | |||
18 | 5.63 | 253.5 | |||
19 | 3.77 | 226.4 | |||
20 | 3.60 | 233.5 | |||
21 | 3.57 | 61.4 | |||
Average | 3.02* | 66.2* | 4.68 | 242.9 | |
SD | 0.30 | 62.8 | 0.81 | 67.2 | |
SE | 0.04 | 9.6 | 0.07 | 5.6 |
The data are presented as average, standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE). The data from Rs were compared to the corresponding data from NRs using an unpaired Student’s t test (two-tailed). See text for experimental details
p<0.001