Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;8:167. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00167

Table 2.

Comparison of relative abundance of urinary microbiome between cancer group and control group at all taxonomic levels.

Taxa Cancer Non-cancer P-value FDR
Phylum Proteobacteria 39.704 48.954 Ns Ns
Firmicutes 32.840 28.144 Ns Ns
Actinobacteria 7.073 6.183 Ns Ns
Bacteroidetes 3.932 9.439 Ns Ns
Class Gammaproteobacteria 31.218 39.250 Ns Ns
Bacilli 28.863 20.054 Ns Ns
Actinobacteria 6.143 5.771 Ns Ns
Betaproteobacteria 5.061 6.317 Ns Ns
Order Enterobacteriales 17.435 26.133 Ns Ns
Bacillales 17.112 12.756 Ns Ns
Lactobacillales 11.790 7.431 Ns Ns
Corynebacteriales 3.839 1.733 Ns Ns
Bacteroidales 3.049 8.619 Ns Ns
Family Enterobacteriaceae 17.470 26.173 Ns Ns
Staphylococcaceae 12.213 10.161 Ns Ns
Streptococcaceae 9.286 4.567 Ns Ns
Thermoactinomycetaceae 0.000 0.30185 0.001 0.005
Sphingobacteriaceae 0.225 0.012 0.012 0.047
Carnobacteriaceae 0.140 0.022 Ns Ns
Genus Escherichia-Shigella 15.373 24.460 Ns Ns
Staphylococcus 12.154 10.123 Ns Ns
Streptococcus 9.280 4.587 Ns Ns
Aeromonas 3.782 0.018 0.046 Ns
Acinetobacter 3.252 1.092 0.018 0.048
Bacteroides 0.064 1.584 0.028 Ns
Lactobacillus 1.176 2.626 Ns Ns
Serratia 0.000 0.984 0.001 0.003
Proteus 0.000 0.312 0.001 0.003
Laceyella 0.000 0.304 0.001 0.003
Fusobacterium 0.049 0.016 Ns Ns

Data were reported as mean percentage; FDR, P-value after false discovery rate adjustment; Ns, not significant (based on P < 0.05).