Skip to main content
. 2018 May;6(3):161–168.

Table 1.

Type of study, level of evidence, number of patients initially enrolled and finally evaluated

Study Year Study level Patients enrolled Patients evaluated
Mehl et al (22) 2016 Prospective Controlled II 27 (1Revision to TKA) 26
26 26
Vaishya et al (26) 2016 Prospective non controlled III 46 (6 lost follow up) 40
Arun et al (25) 2015 Retrospective IV 30 (2revision and 2 lost follow up) 26
Schuster et al (24) 2015 Prospective non controlled III 23 23 (22 in full examination)
Trojani et al (27) 2014 Retrospective Comparative III 34 29
Zaffagnini et al (28) 2013 Prospective non controlled III 32 32