Table 2.
The association* between social capital determinants and good self-rated health in high-school students, Lithuania, Social capital survey, 2016.
| Model 1OR (95% CI) | Model 2OR (95% CI) | Model 3OR (95% CI) | Model 4OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family social capital | ||||
| Low | ||||
| High | 1.83*** (1.35–2.48) | 1.66*** (1.22–2.56) | ||
| Neighborhood trust | ||||
| Low | ||||
| High | 1.44*** (1.19–1.75) | 1.29* (1.05–1.58) | ||
| Informal social control | ||||
| Low | ||||
| High | 0.96 (0.77–1.18) | 0.93 (0.76–1.15) | ||
| Vertical school trust | ||||
| Low | ||||
| High | 1.31* (1.05–1.63) | 1.23* (1.00–1.54) | ||
| Horizontal school trust | ||||
| Low | ||||
| High | 1.15 (0.92–1.44) | 1.10 (0.87–1.39) | ||
| Reciprocity at school | ||||
| Low | ||||
| High | 1.03 (0.80–1.32) | 0.97 (0.76–1.25) | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Boys | ||||
| Girls | 0.52 (0.43–0.64)*** | 0.55 (0.45–0.67)*** | 0.54 (0.45–0.66)*** | 0.54 (0.44–0.66)*** |
| Body mass index | ||||
| Normal | ||||
| Overweight/obese | 0.50 (0.36–0.71)*** | 0.51 (0.36–0.72)*** | 0.50 (0.35–0.70)*** | 0.50 (0.35–0.70)*** |
| Self-perceived socioeconomic status | ||||
| High/middle | ||||
| Low | 0.79 (0.63–0.99)* | 0.77 (0.62–0.98)* | 0.78 (0.62–0.98)* | 0.81 (0.64–1.02) |
| Psychological distress | ||||
| High | ||||
| Low | 0.49 (0.38–0.62)*** | 0.48 (0.38–0.61)*** | 0.49 (0.38–0.62)*** | 0.53 (0.41–0.68)*** |
| Physical activity | ||||
| High/moderate | ||||
| Low | 0.54 (0.43–0.68)*** | 0.54 (0.43–0.68)*** | 0.54 (0.43–0.68)*** | 0.55 (0.44–0.69)*** |
*: association measured as Odds Ratio from logistic regression model
Model 1: examine the associations between family social capital and youth self-rated health adjusting for gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, psychological distress and physical activity.
Model 2: examine the associations between neighborhood social capital and youth self-rated health adjusting for gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, psychological distress and physical activity.
Model 3: examine the associations between school social capital and youth self-rated health adjusting for gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, psychological distress and physical activity.
Model 4: examine the associations between all social capital variables and youth self-rated health adjusting for gender, body mass index, self-perceived socioeconomic status, psychological distress and physical activity.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval