Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 20;46(5):1910–1918. doi: 10.1177/0300060518757899

Table 3.

Chi-square test and cross analysis

Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
Sex vs. willingness to reference physician evaluation platforms Pearson chi-square significance: 0.048% (<0.05)
Male 2.47% 3.70% 30.86% 43.21% 19.75%
Female 0.00% 0.84% 21.01% 60.50% 17.65%
Age vs. willingness to reference physician evaluation platforms Pearson chi-square significance: 0.000% (<0.05)
21–30 y 0.00% 1.74% 15.65% 62.61% 20.00%
31–40 y 4.55% 0.00% 36.36% 40.91% 18.18%
41–50 y 0.00% 2.13% 29.79% 51.06% 17.02%
51–60 y 7.69% 7.69% 69.23% 15.38% 0.00%
≥61 y 0.00% 0.00% 33.33% 0.00% 66.67%
Education level vs. need for physician evaluation platforms Pearson chi-square significance: 0.000% (<0.05)
High school 0.00% 6.45% 35.48% 32.26% 25.81%
Undergraduate 0.00% 0.95% 25.71% 63.81% 9.52%
Graduate 4.92% 1.00% 16.39% 59.02% 18.03%
PHD 0.00% 33.33% 0.00% 33.33% 33.33%
Occupation vs. trust for physician evaluation platforms Pearson chi-square significance: 0.002% (<0.05)
Physicians 15.38% 15.38% 46.15% 23.08% 0.00%
Pharmacists 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Nurses 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00%
Social workers 5.88% 5.88% 58.82% 5.88% 25.53%
Business owners 0.00% 0.00% 40.00% 60.00% 0.00%
Business executives 6.25% 0.00% 56.25% 31.25% 2.00%
Specialists 0.00% 12.00% 48.00% 36.00% 4.00%
Service industry 3.45% 0.00% 62.07% 34.48% 0.00%
Agricultural, forestry, fishery, animal husbandry 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Civil servants 0.00% 0.00% 60.00% 40.00% 0.00%
Military 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Students 0.00% 2.53% 37.97% 56.96% 2.53%