Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;46(5):1709–1716. doi: 10.1177/0300060518756244

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics and oncologists’ willingness to use percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (N=361).

Characteristic Willing to use PEG Not willing to use PEG Statistical significance
Sex
 male 121 (67.4) 57 (32.6) ns
 female 139 (76.0) 44 (24.0)
Age
 <40 years old 161 (69.4) 71 (30.6) ns
 ≥40 years old 99 (76.7) 30 (23.3)
Years of working
 <5 years 75 (67.6) 36 (32.4) 0.044
 ≥5 years 188 (75.2) 62 (24.8)
Work environment
 General hospital 206 (74.4) 71 (25.6) ns
 Specialist hospital 54 (64.3) 30 (35.7)
Number of beds
 <1000 beds 61 (66.3) 31 (33.7) ns
 ≥1000 beds 199 (74.0) 70 (26.0)
Number of years treating patients with HNC*
 <50 115 (70.6) 48 (29.4) ns
 ≥50 144 (73.1) 53 (26.9)
Incidence of difficulty in feeding
 <50% 161 (73.9) 57 (26.1) ns
 ≥50% 99 (69.2) 44 (30.8)
Degree of understanding of PEG
 high 25 (89.3) 3 (10.7) 0.031
 partial 182 (70.8) 68 (27.2)
 none 53 (63.9) 30 (36.1)
Hospitals carrying out PEG technology
 yes 127 (75.1) 42 (24.9) ns
 no 96 (71.6) 38 (28.4)
 don't know 37 (63.8) 21 (36.2)
Confident user of PEG
 yes 15 (88.2) 2 (11.8) ns
 no 245 (71.2) 99 (28.8)
Willing to accept PEG training
 yes 230 (88.5) 30 (11.5) 0.001
 no 62 (61.4) 39 (38.6)
Who will operate PEG?
 competent doctor 27 (73.0 10 (27.0) ns
 trained professionals 149 (72.3) 57 (27.7)
 gastroscope room/ radiology department 80 (70.8) 33 (29.2)
 surgeon# 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0)

Data presented as n (%)

*n=360

#some oncologists added their own text

PEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy