. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0198335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198335

Table 3. Segmentation performance scores MP2RAGE data set.

The table shows the DICE (larger is better) and AVHD (less is better) for the initial CBS tools and FSL FAST GM segmentations as well as after additional masking, using either the gradient magnitude or the compositional data method.

	CBS		FAST
	DICE^a	AVHD^a	DICE^a	AVHD^a
S001
Init	0.8943	0.3711	0.8403	1.0523
Init + GraMag	0.9141	0.4013	0.8248	0.8241
Init + CoDa	0.9185	0.3249	0.8795	0.5757
S013
Init	0.8672	0.5641	0.7859	1.0272
Init + GraMag	0.8629	0.4921	0.7653	0.8835
Init + CoDa	0.8648	0.4835	0.8137	0.7225
S014
Init	0.8695	0.5897	0.8376	0.9203
Init + GraMag	0.8606	0.4859	0.8136	0.7260
Init + CoDa	0.8710	0.4921	0.8486	0.6789
S019
Init	0.9077	0.4517	0.8529	0.9529
Init + GraMag	0.8865	0.3301	0.8218	0.7005
Init + CoDa	0.8888	0.4096	0.8642	0.6024

DICE, DICE Coefficient; AVHD, Average Hausdorff Distance; Init, initial segmentation; GraMag, gradient magnitude method; CoDa, compositional data method.

^a After masking of areas affected by artifact in the T2s image.