Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;13(6):e0198691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198691

Table 3. Non-displaceable binding potentials of dopamine reuptake transporters.

Subject and group Caudate nucleus left Putamen left Striatum left Caudate nucleus right Putamen right Striatum right Asymmetry index STN–
wue03 0.49 0.31 0.40 0.31 0.28 0.30 28.57 R
wue09 0.72 0.48 0.61 0.62 0.37 0.49 21.82 R
wue04 1.15 0.70 0.93 0.58 0.44 0.50 60.14 R
wue02 0.88 0.57 0.72 1.43 0.91 1.17 47.62 L
wue10 0.97 0.50 0.75 1.20 0.74 0.96 24.56 L
wue07 0.92 0.64 0.76 1.22 0.79 1.00 27.27 L
wue06 1.31 0.59 0.95 1.56 0.91 1.20 23.26 L
wue11 1.15 0.79 0.96 1.41 0.74 1.05 8.96 L
PD 0.95±0.26* 0.57±0.15* 0.76±0.19* 1.04±0.47* 0.65±0.25* 0.83±0.35* 30.27±16.09*
HC 2.57±0.57 2.30±0.42 2.33±0.48 2.62±0.52 2.23±0.48 2.30±0.48 2.57±2.14

The BPND of DAT in the striatum was used to identify the hemisphere with less (i.e. STN–, bold) or more (i.e. STN+) dopaminergic innervation. For healthy subjects, we considered the average striatal binding of left and right, which did not significantly differ. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation.

* p<0.05

Steel-Dwass all pairs. BPND, non-displaceable binding potential; DAT, dopamine reuptake transporter; HC = healthy control group; PD = Parkinson’s disease patient group; STN = subthalamic nucleus.