Table 4.

Prediction of “use of rehabilitation”

Binary logistic regression (N = 473)
First step: Nagelkerke R 2	10.1
Second step: Nagelkerke R 2	15.8
Third step: Nagelkerke R 2	31.5

Variables (third step)	Wald	p	Odds ratio	95% confidence interval
Age	1.748	.186	1.018	0.991–1.045
Living with partnera	5.551	.018	0.541	0.324–0.902
Level of educationb	6.601	.010	0.548	0.346–0.867
Diagnostic subgroup: secondary progressivec	2.003	.157	1.596	0.835–3.048
Time since last exacerbation	2.356	.125	1.434	0.905–2.274
Time since the first MS symptoms	0.415	.520	1.014	0.972–1.058
Time since MS diagnosis	0.166	.683	1.010	0.963–1.059
Consequences	7.150	.007	1.243	1.060–1.457
Personal control	0.217	.641	0.974	0.870–1.090
Treatment control	18.591	<.001	1.256	1.133–1.394
Identity	3.233	.072	1.164	0.986–1.374
Concern	2.244	.134	0.913	0.810–1.029
Coherence	1.084	.298	1.054	0.955–1.164
Emotional response	0.523	.470	1.043	0.931–1.168

^aLiving with partner: 1 = yes;

^bLevel of education: 1 = higher (technical college qualification or university qualification);

^cDiagnostic subgroup: secondary progressive: 1 = yes.