Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Genet Evol. 2017 Dec 7;63:316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.12.006

Table 2.

Comparison of Different Sequencing Approaches for Evaluation of Microbiome

Technique Accuracy Fungus/Virus detection Resistance mutation detection Metabolic activity Limitations of technique
Metataxonomic (e.g., 16S or ITS) Genus Fungus with ITS No No Differences in variable regions (V1–V9) used for sequencing
Metagenomic (e.g., shotgun) Species or Strain Yes Yes No Need deep sequencing for adequate coverage
RNA-seq Species Yes Yes Yes RNA less stable than DNA and requires careful processing