Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Feb 16;126(5):326–335. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21982

Table 3.

Criteria used for classification for each diagnostic category

G2 WD G3 PD small
cell
PD
Large
cell
PD
NOS
Total 19 32 6 5 3
>1 factor supporting WD No. (%) 15 (80) 13 (46) 0 0 0
IHC loss of DAXX or ATRX No. (%) 0 6 (19) 0 0 0
DAXX, ATRX, or MEN1 mutation No. (%) 6 (31) 9 (28) 0 0 0
All Ki67 proliferation No. (%) rates <20% 19 (100) 0 0 0 0
G1/G2 on prior biopsy or resection No. (%) 8 (42) 24 (75) 0 0 0
>1 factor supporting PD No. (%) 0 0 4 (67) 0 2 (67)
Loss of RB IHC staining No. (%) 0 0 3 (50) 1 (20) 2 (67)
RB1, TP53, or KRAS mutation No. (%) 12(5) 22(32) 1 (17) 0 2 (67)
Adenocarcinoma component No. (%) 0 0 0 0 0
Consensus on morphology differentiation1 0 5 (16) 1 (17) 4 (80) 0

Abbreviations: WD - well differentiated, PD - poorly differentiated, No. - Number, NOS - not otherwise specified.

1

Consensus review was used in cases without ancillary supporting information.

2

TP53 mutations were seen in 3 cases with additional criteria supporting WD.