Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2018 Mar 10;11(5):788–797. doi: 10.1002/aur.1943

Table 4.

Final latent class growth models for parent and examiner prospective dimensional ratings

Parameter Estimate SE p-value
Examiner Ratings, Group (%)

Group 1 (20.3%) Intercept 1.991 0.298 <.001
Linear
Group 2 (80.7%) Intercept 1.442 0.205 <.001
Linear 0.013 0.006 .019

Parent Ratings, Group (%)

Group 1 (16.1%) Intercept 1.048 0.064 <.001
Linear
Group 2 (66.3%) Intercept −0.353 0.218 .105
Linear 0.040 0.008 <.001
Group 3 (17.6%) Intercept 0.880 0.547 .108
Linear −0.239 0.089 .007

SE = standard error. Ratings on the original scales (ranging from 5–15 for examiners and 3–9 for parents) were rescaled (to 0–10 and 0–6, respectively) by subtracting the scores from the maximum of the corresponding scale, so that zero scores correspond to no deficits in social-communication. Latent class growth models for count data were fitted to the rescaled data.