Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 7;8:8716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26707-8

Table 3.

Ranking of the candidate reference genes according to five different evaluation methods.

Gene Comprehensive Ranking Delta Ct geNorm NormFinder BestKeeper
Value Rank SD aver. Rank M value Rank Stability Rank SD Rank
Atp5f1 1.00 1 1.03 1 0.362 1 0.288 1 0.40 1
Pgk1 1.86 2 1.12 3 0.362 1 0.489 2 0.46 2
Gapdh 2.91 3 1.11 2 0.504 2 0.516 4 0.48 3
Tfrc 4.23 4 1.14 4 0.560 3 0.640 5 0.52 4
Ppia 6.12 7 1.18 5 0.580 4 0.742 7 0.67 8
Gusb 5.66 5 1.22 7 0.729 6 0.502 3 0.60 7
Ywhaz 6.00 6 1.21 6 0.643 5 0.716 6 0.55 6
B2m 7.11 8 1.31 8 0.790 7 0.784 8 0.54 5
Actb 9.24 9 1.45 9 0.847 8 1.140 9 0.89 10
Tbp 9.74 10 1.59 10 0.952 9 1.194 10 0.86 9
Hprt 11.00 11 2.07 11 1.154 10 1.767 11 1.35 11
Rps18 12.00 12 2.88 12 1.441 11 2.750 12 2.11 12

Atp5f1, Pgk1 and Gapdh were ranked as the most stable candidate reference genes, while Rps18, Hprt, and Tbp/Actb were designated as the least stable ones.