Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2018 May 24;28(11):1736–1743.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.020

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pre-cue spindles prevented post-cue spindle increases and negatively predicted memory retention. (A) Analyses across both experiments revealed that pre-cue spindles (occurring −2.5–0 s) reversed the prevalence of early versus late post-cue spindles. **: p < 0.01. (B) Better-remembered items showed higher post-cue but lower pre-cue sigma power than worse-remembered items. Horizontal bars indicate significant time segments (p < 0.05). (Inset) Topographical maps of RMS values for better – worse memory centered around −1550 ms and 1300 ms, respectively.