Table 3.
Multilevel analysis: change in the quality of care according to patients at the end of the project
| Change in the quality of care by patients at T2 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Response | B | S.E. |
| Fixed Part | ||
| Constant | 2.499 | (0.393) |
| Female1 | −0.018 | (0.078) |
| Age | −0.006* | (0.002) |
| Success of project management according to interviewers | −0.012 | (0.064) |
| Success of network governance according to project board members | 0.015 | (0.039) |
| Random Part | ||
| Level: project | ||
| cons/cons | 0.015 | (0.012) |
| Level: patient | ||
| cons/cons | 0.205* | (0.021) |
| ICC2 | 0.068 | |
| -2*loglikelihood: | 261.758 | |
| N project | 19 | |
| N patient | 201 | |
1ref cat: Male
2ICC = Intra Class Correlation
*p < .05