Data protections |
The key is set, is kept very safe by the computer and only given to people who are allowed to see your list of medicines. I like that specific example, too. I think it would put – it put my mind at ease. I think it would put other people’s mind at ease about the protection of personal information. |
Researcher availability |
You may contact [study PI] if you have any questions or concerns. I appreciate that statement right there, because sometimes I do have questions. I would like to talk directly to someone instead of being told to call back or talk to a machine. |
Researcher and/or institutional expertise |
It’s good to know that you have to have special training to actually authorize and access people’s records. |
Not sharing personal information with drug companies |
To be seen by or sold to drug companies. Thank God. Oh, goodness. Okay, I chuckle at that, because particularly seniors already pay through the nose about drug companies. I wouldn’t trust their ethics or their motivation for getting the information. |
P: That’s cool. That’s interesting. My health record cannot be sold by or seen by the drug companies. |
I: Why is that interesting to you? |
P: I wouldn’t want phone calls from different drug companies, so I would think that would be a good thing. Getting phone calls, “Try this drug. Try this drug.” |
Rights as research subject |
P: “No studies on people can be conducted at the University of Florida without a thorough review of the ethics of the study and rigorous protection of the patient.” Okay. In other words, they have to come and ask me. They can’t do a study on me unless they come to me and get my consent. Correct? |
I: That’s what you understand it. |
P: Okay. That is something that is noted that is a positive. |
Then I like the no cost for the participation. |