Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 8;19:188. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2097-4

Table 3.

Comparison of the Lewinnek target zone

ALA (n = 94) DAA (n = 64) p-value
Abduction (%) (n) in zone 85.1 (80) 96.9 (62) 0.016
out of zone 14.9 (14) 3.1 (2)
Anterversion (%) (n) in zone 83 (78) 92.2 (59) 0. 094
out of zone 17 (16) 7.8 (5)

Abduction zone: 30°-50°, Anteversion zone: 5°-25°

ALA Anterolateral approach, DAA Direct anterior approach