Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 8;22:154. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2061-6

Table 2.

Number and percentages of patients with RRT and AKI according to outcome and targeted temperature management

A
All patients (n = 126) Normothermia (n = 71) Hypothermia (n = 55) p value
AKI, n (%) 49 (69) 24 (44) 0.004
 AKI 1, n (%) 21 (30) 11 (20)
 AKI 2, n (%) 8 (11) 4 (7)
 AKI 3, n (%) 20 (28) 9 (16)
RRT, n (%) 14 (20) 6 (11) ns
B
Favourable outcome (n = 62) Normothermia (n = 27) Hypothermia (n = 35) p value
AKI, n (%) 14 (52) 14 (40) ns
 AKI 1, n (%) 5 (19) 8 (23)
 AKI 2, n (%) 2 (7) 3 (9)
 AKI 3, n (%) 7 (26) 3 (9)
RRT, n (%) 5 (19) 2 (6) ns
C
Poor outcome (n = 64) Normothermia (n = 44) Hypothermia (n = 20) p value
AKI, n (%) 35 (80) 10 (50) 0.017
 AKI 1, n (%) 16 (36) 3 (15)
 AKI 2, n (%) 6 (14) 1 (5)
 AKI 3, n (%) 13 (30) 6 (30)
RRT, n (%) 9 (21) 4 (20) ns

Number (and percentages) of patients with continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) and Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 1–3 and only stage 3 (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)) in all patients (A), patients with good (B) and poor (C) neurological outcome treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia or normothermia

ns not significant