Table 1.

Summary of methods for mapping resource selection function model results that employ stretched displays based on a review of the literature. The number of studies employing each method, the percentage of studies using each method, and references are reported.

Method	Number of studies	% studies	References
Histogram smoother	1	2.94%	(M Hebblewhite, Merrill, & McDonald, 2005)
0 – 1 stretch	15	44.12%	(Boyce & Waller, 2003; Brook & McLachlan, 2009; DeCesare et al., 2012; Dellinger et al., 2013; Dugal et al., 2013; Fortin et al., 2008; Mark Hebblewhite & Merrill, 2008; Horne et al., 2014; Hough & Dieter, 2009; Johnson, Seip, & Boyce, 2004; Mace et al., 1999; Mashintonio et al., 2014; Richardson et al., 2005; Squires et al., 2013; Teichman et al., 2013)
min – max stretch	3	8.82%	(Allred, Fuhlendorf, Engle, & Elmore, 2011; Allred, Fuhlendorf, & Hamilton, 2011; Singh, Yoccoz, Bhatnagar, & Fox, 2009)
Low to high stretch	14	41.18%	(Anderson et al., 2005; Barker & Derocher, 2010; Boyce & Waller, 2003; Durner et al., 2009; Fattebert, Robinson, Balme, Slotow, & Hunter, 2015; Irwin, Rock, & Rock, 2012; Joly, 2011; Krebs, Lofroth, & Parfitt, 2007; Loe, Bonenfant, Meisingset, & Mysterud, 2012; Merkle et al., 2011; Morehouse & Boyce, 2013; Niemuth, Estey, & Loesch, 2002; Recio, Mathieu, Virgós, & Seddon, 2014; Weckworth et al., 2013)
Standard deviations	1	2.94%	(Newsome, Ballard, Dickman, Fleming, & Howden, 2013)
Total	34	100%