Skip to main content
. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0194463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194463

Table 1. Characteristics and results of the included studies.

Study Country No.of P.(1097) Method FIGOStage (Ⅰ-Ⅱ/Ⅲ-Ⅳ) tumor grade(G1/G2/G3) lymph nodly metastasis(yes /no) Survivin(+) NOS
Ovarian carcinoma Borderline ovarian tumor Ovarian benign tumor Normal ovarian tissues
Sui[11]2002 Japan 103 IHC 19/28 21/13/13 24/19 24 11 7 7
Ju LL[16]2016 China 60 IHC 19/20 8/31* 8 3 1 8
Kanter M[17]2016 Turkey 98 IHC 37 4 3 8
Plewka D[18]2015 Europe 157 IHC 41 22 13 0 6
Turan G[19]2014 Turkey 62 IHC 21 10 6 8
Qian X[20]2011 China 91 IHC 55 4 0 7
Huang Y[21]2011 China 65 IHC 7/18 2/23* 26 6 5 8
Liguang Z[22]2007 China 114 RT-PCR 28/35 30Δ/33 34/29 46 9 4 0 6
Gao Q[23]2007 China 70 IHC 10/36 22Δ/24 28 5 0 7
Yin RT[24]2006 China 69 IHC 10/28 13Δ/25 18/13 29 9 0 7
Ma XY[25]2006 China 143 IHC 41/43 32/34/18 53 12 0 7
Zhang SL[26]2003 China 65 RT-PCR 14/21 24Δ/11 13/22 29 8 2 0 6

*, G2-G3

Δ, G1-G2

No. of P, number of patients; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; IHC, immunohistochemistry