Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Spat Demogr. 2015 Jun 23;4(2):135–153. doi: 10.1007/s40980-015-0013-1

Table 2.

Bias associated with point extraction from discrete rasters. Results of one-sample t-tests addressing the significance of bias associated with raster cell extraction. Point extraction is not recommended since it yielded significantly biased effect size estimates throughout most scenarios tested.

Misclassification rate t-statistic p-value Mean bias Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI
≤ 11% 4.69 < 0.0001 0.019 0.011 0.026
11%–20% 4.53 < 0.0001 0.018 0.010 0.026
≥ 20% 5.38 < 0.0001 0.018 0.012 0.025