Table 1.
Potential harm | Example hazards | Assessment Parameters* |
---|---|---|
Increased disease transmission | Increased abundance of vector mosquitoes | Fitness components including15: |
Growth rate | ||
Mating success | ||
Fecundity | ||
Adult, egg, or larval survival | ||
Environmental tolerances | ||
Increased vectorial capacity | Host seeking and biting activity15 | |
Vector competence* (Plasmodium or other pathogens carried by Anopheles gambiae) | ||
Change in temperature tolerance that could affect environmental niche or range | ||
Reduced control capability | Insecticide resistance* | |
Increased direct pathology | Increased allergenicity | Known allergenic sequences expressed by construct; construct-encoded proteins detected in saliva |
Increased toxicity | Standard toxicity test on construct-encoded proteins | |
Increased parasite virulence (population replacement)96 | Genotypic or phenotypic changes in parasites after passage through gene drive mosquitoes† |
Changes to be assessed in comparison to local wild-type mosquitoes of the same genetic background.
This would best be performed with gametocytes collected from the field testing site to reflect the diversity of parasite strains circulating at the location and will not predict the evolutionary consequences of ongoing interactions of the parasite with the mosquito and vertebrate host over time.