Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;7:e35677. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35677

Table 1. Statistics of X-ray crystallographic data collection and model refinement.

Data collection
Dataset EphA2/SHIP2 EphA6/Odin EphA5/SAMD5
Space group C2 P212121 C2
Unit cell (a, b, c, Å) 138.283, 43.344, 46.377 38.985, 85.042, 98.383 98.195, 29.651, 54.170
Unit cell (α, β, γ, °) 90, 95.354, 90 90, 90, 90 90, 109.952, 90
Wavelength (Å) 0.97915 0.97915 0.97961
Resolution range (Å) 50.00–1.50
(1.53–1.50)
50.00–1.30
(1.32–1.30)
50.00–1.90
(1.93–1.90)
No. of unique reflections 43485 (2131) 79398 (3792) 11829 (575)
Redundancy 3.6 (3.5) 5.9 (5.7) 3.2 (3.2)
I/σ 37.9 (2.4) 39.2 (2.1) 25.7 (1.9)
Completeness (%) 99.0 (98.1) 97.8 (95.1) 99.1 (100.0)
Rmerge (%)* 4.7 (62.4) 5.4 (90.3) 5.3 (77.1)
Structure refinement
Resolution (Å) 50.0–1.50
(1.55–1.50)
50.0–1.30
(1.35–1.30)
50.0–1.90
(1.96–1.90)
Rcryst/Rfree 0.1434 (0.2686)/
0.1911 (0.3129)
0.1695 (0.2565)/
0.1987 (0.2671)
0.1938 (0.3256)/
0.2340 (0.3282)
Rmsd bonds (Å)/angles (°) 0.009/1.22 0.010/1.52 0.015/1.67
Average B factor (Å2)§ 30.8 22.8 30.1
No. of protein atoms 2046 2745 1058
No. of other atoms 273 443 96
No. of reflections
 Working set 41244 (4003) 77272 (7372) 11252 (1065)
 Test set 2186 (227) 1947 (190) 565 (57)
Ramachandran plot (%)§
 Favored regions 99.2 99.1 98.5
 Allowed regions 0.8 0.9 1.5
 Outliers 0 0 0

Numbers in parentheses represent the value for the highest resolution shell.

* Rmerge =Σ|Ii - Im|/ΣIi, where Ii is the intensity of the measured reflection and Im is the mean intensity of all symmetry-related reflections.

† Rcryst = Σ||Fobs| - |Fcalc||/Σ|Fobs|, where Fobs and Fcalc are observed and calculated structure factors.

‡ Rfree = ΣT||Fobs| - |Fcalc||/ΣT|Fobs|, where T is a test data set randomly chosen and set aside prior to refinement. For EphA6-Odin, 2.5% of total reflections were enough for the test set during refinement. For EphA2-SHIP2 and EphA5-SAMD5, 5% of total reflections were chosen as test sets.

§ B factors and Ramachandran plot statistics are calculated using MOLPROBITY (Chen et al., 2010).