Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 22;31(5):dox148. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox148

Table 2.

Baseline patient, facility, and disease characteristics affecting overall survival (N = 6,274)

Univariable hazard P-value testing Multivariable† P-value testing
ratio [95% CI] HR = 1 hazard ratio [95% CI] HR = 1
Age 1.02 [1.01–1.02] <0.001 1.01 [1.01, 1.02] <0.001
Gender
 Female Ref Ref
 Male 1.12 [1.02, 1.23] 0.02 1.10 [1.00, 1.22] 0.05
Hispanic
 No Ref Ref
 Yes 0.89 [0.68, 1.15] 0.35 0.88 [0.68, 1.15] 0.36
Race
 White Ref Ref
 Black 1.05[0.90, 1.23] 0.51 1.06 [0.90, 1.26] 0.48
 Asian 1.17 [0.86, 1.58] 0.32 1.26 [0.92, 1.72] 0.14
 Other 0.81[0.45, 1.43] 0.46 0.94 [0.53, 1.68] 0.83
Insurance
 Uninsured Ref Ref
 Private 0.61 [0.49, 0.75] <0.001 0.62 [0.50, 0.77] <0.001
 Government 0.80 [0.64, 0.99] 0.04 0.73 [0.58, 0.91] 0.005
% without HS education
 >21% Ref Ref
 13–20.9% 0.87 [0.78, 0.97] 0.01 0.86 [0.77, 0.97] 0.02
 7–12.9% 0.81 [0.73, 0.90] <0.001 0.83 [0.73, 0.94] 0.004
 <7% 0.78 [0.70, 0.87] <0.001 0.82 [0.70, 0.95] 0.008
Median Income
 <$30000 Ref Ref
 $30000–$35999 0.92 [0.83, 1.03] 0.14 1.00 [0.90, 1.13] 0.94
 $36000–$45999 0.90 [0.81, 1.00] 0.05 1.02 [0.90, 1.15] 0.75
 >$46000 0.84 [0.76, 0.93] <0.001 0.99 [0.86, 1.13] 0.83
Deyo/Charlson Comorbidity Score
 0 Ref Ref
 1 1.20 [1.11, 1.30] <0.001 1.18 [1.08, 1.27] <0.001
 ≥2 1.24 [1.05, 1.45] 0.010 1.21 [1.03, 1.43] 0.02
Histology
 SCC Ref 0.20 Ref 0.15
 Adeno 1.06 [0.97, 1.16] 0.93 [0.84, 1.03]
Stage
 1 Ref Ref
 2 1.30 [1.18, 1.44] <0.001 1.30 [1.18, 1.45] <0.001
 3 1.66 [1.50, 1.83] <0.001 1.71 [1.54, 1.89] <0.001
Grade
 Well differentiated Ref Ref
 Moderately differentiated 1.27 [1.07, 1.50] 0.007 1.21 [1.02, 1.44] 0.03
 Poorly differentiated 1.49 [1.26, 1.77] <0.001 1.43 [1.20, 1.70] <0.001
 Undifferentiated 1.25 [0.91, 1.72] 0.15 1.24 [0.90, 1.70] 0.18
Distance to facility (miles)
 <12.5 Ref Ref
 12.5–50 1.04 [0.97, 1.12] 0.29 1.02 [0.94, 1.10] 0.67
 ≥50 0.96 [0.88, 1.05] 0.36 0.93 [0.83, 1.04] 0.19
Facility type
 Community Cancer Program Ref Ref
 Comprehensive Comm Cancer 0.93 [0.80, 1.07] 0.29 0.94 [0.82, 1.08] 0.38
 Academic/Research Program 0.81 [0.70, 0.93] 0.004 0.83 [0.73, 0.96] 0.01
 Other 0.89 [0.72, 1.09] 0.2478 0.92 [0.77, 1.10] 0.34
Facility location
 Central Ref Ref
 Northeast 1.04 [0.95, 1.14] 0.35 1.05 [0.96, 1.16] 0.27
 South 1.18 [1.08, 1.29] <0.001 1.14 [1.04, 1.25] 0.008
 West 0.99 [0.88, 1.12] 0.92 0.94 [0.83, 1.07] 0.35
Facility setting
 Urban Ref Ref
 Rural 0.99 [0.80, 1.21] 0.88 1.01 [0.82, 1.25] 0.90
 Metro 0.89 [0.73, 1.08] 0.23 0.93 [0.75, 1.15] 0.49
Year of diagnosis
 2004 Ref Ref
 2005 1.01 [0.87, 1.17] 0.89 1.05 [0.91, 1.22] 0.52
 2006 0.89 [0.76, 1.03] 0.10 0.86 [0.74, 1.00] 0.05
 2007 0.95 [0.82, 1.11] 0.53 0.91 [0.79, 1.06] 0.23
 2008 0.93 [0.80, 1.07] 0.29 0.92 [0.79, 1.06] 0.23
 2009 0.94 [0.81, 1.09] 0.39 0.93 [0.80, 1.07] 0.30
 2010 0.98 [0.84, 1.13] 0.75 0.97 [0.83, 1.12] 0.65
 2011 0.95 [0.82, 1.10] 0.52 0.95 [0.82, 1.10] 0.53
 2012 0.90 [0.77, 1.05] 0.18 0.90 [0.77, 1.05] 0.18

P-value < 0.05 bolded.

Multivariable HR was estimated from the full Cox proportional hazards model including all covariates presented in this table.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.