. 2017 Nov 13;52(4):1957–1976. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6

Table 6.

Logistic regressions of the data in “Appendix”

	a	X₁	X₂₁	X₂₂	X₂₃	X₂₄
Class and Vote
Model 1
Coefficient	− 0.458	1.492
SE	(0.058)	(0.116)
Exponent	0.632	4.444
Nagelkerke r²		0.149				.
Economic Competence and Vote
Model 2a
Coefficient	− 0.549		0.523
SE	(0.056)		(0.112)
Exponent	0.577		1.687
Nagelkerke r²			0.020
Model 2b
Coefficient	− 0.347			4.277
SE	(0.087)			(0.173)
Exponent	0.707			72.000
Nagelkerke r²				0.662
Model 2c
Coefficient	− 0.347				4.277
SE	(0.087)				(0.173)
Exponent	0.707				72.000
Nagelkerke r²					0.662
Model 2d
Coefficient	− 0.394					2.621
SE	(0.066)					(0.131)
Exponent	0.674					13.750
Nagelkerke r²						0.375
Class, Economic Competence and Vote
Model 3a
Coefficient	− 0.409	1.456	0.392
SE	(0.060)	(0.117)	(0.119)
Exponent	0.664	4.288	1.480
Nagelkerke R²			0.158
Model 3b
Coefficient	− 0.261	0.846		4.110
SE	(0.089)	(0.179)		(0.175)
Exponent	0.771	2.330		60.957
Nagelkerke R²				0.672
Model 3c
Coefficient	− 0.458	− 19.433			23.122
SE	(0.089)	(2289.293)			(2289.293)
Exponent	(0.632)	0.000			0.000
Nagelkerke R²					0.700
Model 3d
Coefficient	− 0.458	− 20.121				22.423
SE	(0.067)	(3229.065)				(3229.065)
Exponent	0.632	0.000				5,474,103,965.0
Nagelkerke R²						0.428