Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 24;45(8):1405–1416. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3976-5

Table 1.

Details of the healthy controls recruited in each center and the SPECT system used for imaging

Center Men (n) Women (n) Age (years) Combinations of SPECT scanner + Collimators
Mean ± SD Range Combination of first scan (no. of subjects) Combination of second scan (no. of subjects)
Chiba 9 21 64 ± 23 41–82 GE Infinia + ELEGP (18) GE Infinia + LEHR (18)
Toyoake 14 22 70 ± 6 55–82 Toshiba 9300R + fan-beam (36) Siemens Symbia T6 or T16 + LMEGP (36)
Kobe 25 3 38 ± 7 30–63 GE Optima NM/CT 640 + ELEGP (19) Toshiba ECAM + LMEGP (18)
Sapporo 20 20 61 ± 12 38–83 Toshiba 9300R + fan-beam (40) Toshiba ECAM + LMEGP (40)
Tokyo (Kodaira) 19 21 55 ± 27 30–81 Siemens Symbia T6 + LMEGP (23) GE Discovery NM/CT 670 pro+ ELEGP (23)
Tokyo (Shinagawa) 10 16 52 ± 27 35–83 Toshiba 9300R + fan-beam (26) GE Discovery NM/CT 670 + LEHR (26)
Tokyo (Bunkyo) 14 16 57 ± 14 31–79 GE Infinia + LEHR (28) Philips BrightView + Cardiac High Resolution (27)
Sendai 5 21 58 ± 12 30–72 Siemens Symbia + LMEGP (13) GE Infinia + LEHR (13)
Total 116 140 57 ± 15 30–83

LEHR low-energy high-resolution, LMEGP low- to medium-energy general-purpose, ELEGP extended low-energy general-purpose, SD standard deviation

The numbers refer to the subjects and scans included in the analysis of the SPECT data