Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 24;45(8):1405–1416. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3976-5

Table 2.

Correlation of original and calibrated SBRs and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between NOACNOSC (X-axis) and other reconstruction conditions (Y-axis) in healthy controls

Reconstruction conditions Number of SPECT scans Average SBR Range (min, max) Linear regression equation ICC (ρ) 95% confidence interval of ICC (ρ)
Original
 CTACSC 292 9.12 4.41, 14.31 Y = 1.200X + 2.334 0.438 −0.096, 0.781
 ChangACSC 510 10.48 5.41, 19.08 Y = 1.445X + 2.138 0.333 −0.075, 0.698
 CTACNOSC 292 6.72 3.32, 11.46 Y = 0.996X + 1.091 0.860 −0.126, 0.963
 ChangACNOSC 510 7.09 3.40, 12.21 Y = 1.121X + 0.618 0.808 −0.159, 0.945
 NOACNOSC 510 5.77 2.18, 10.94 NA NA NA
Calibrated
 CTACSC 292 8.96 4.37, 13.76 Y = 1.053X + 0.517 0.832 0.372, 0.928
 ChangACSC 510 9.31 4.10, 17.05 Y = 1.103X + 0.297 0.820 0.222, 0.928
 CTACNOSC 292 7.63 3.35, 11.83 Y = 0.825X + 1.011 0.926 0.839, 0.959
 ChangACNOSC 510 7.95 3.97, 14.66 Y = 0.927X + 0.380 0.958 0.940, 0.969
 NOACNOSC 510 8.16 3.81, 13.89 NA NA NA

CTACSC computed tomography attenuation correction with scatter correction, ChangACSC Chang attenuation correction with scatter correction, CTACNOSC computed tomography attenuation correction without scatter correction, ChangACNOSC Chang attenuation correction without scatter correction, NOACNOSC without attenuation or scatter correction