Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;98(5):918–925.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.027

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In Vivo Firing Rate of pChIs Reflects Changes in Excitatory Input, with Pauses Accompanying Withdrawal of Excitation

(A) Firing of pChIs with (left, purple) or without (right, blue) short-latency-evoked action potentials before a pause. Top: example; bottom: average, pause (blue arrow), rebound (green arrow). Firing rate correlation, r2 = 0.78, p < 0.001 (n = 4–5).

(B) Mean ± SEM for amplitude (top) and duration (bottom) of pause and rebound.

(C and D) Top: example striatal LFP; middle top: mean ± SEM of inverted LFP (iLFP); middle: mean firing rate (black) ± SEM (gray) in pChIs (n = 5, n = 9); bottom: mean firing rate (black) ± SEM (gray) in SPNs (n = 5) aligned to maximum of spontaneous iLFP (dashed red line) (C) or contralateral cortical stimulation (0.2 Hz; solid red lines) (D). Purple dashed line, firing rate maxima; shaded blue, pChI firing rate below baseline, a “pause.”

(E) Phase plot of firing rates for ChIs and SPNs. Data were extracted during slow LFP oscillation in (D).