Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;20(5):e194. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9126

Table 6.

Patient predictors of reports concordant with the tool recommendation (dichotomous variables).

Variable Number of reports concordant with the tool recommendation, n (%) Statistica
Chi-square (degrees of freedom) P value
Male patients 54 (43.5)
Female patients 53 (57) 3.8 (1) .05
Rural patients 20 (44)
Urban patients 87 (50.6) 0.6 (1) .46
Mild dementia 74 (74.0)
Mild cognitive impairment 33 (28.2) 45.2 (1) <.001
Caregiver concern 56 (77)
No caregiver concern 51 (35.4) 33.1 (1) <.001
History of collisions 21 (84)
No history of collisions 86 (44.79) 13.6 (1) <.001
Abnormal clock drawing testa 82 (66.7)
Normal clock drawing test 25 (27) 34.2 (1) <.001
Behavioral or neuropsychiatric disturbances 37 (80)
No behavioral or neuropsychiatric disturbances 70 (40.9) 22.6 (1) <.001
Cognitive slowing 49 (75)
No cognitive slowing 58 (38.1) 25.2 (1) <.001
Abnormal Trails B resultb 58 (69)
Normal Trails B result 2 (6) 40.6 (1) <.001

aWe used the Mini-Cog algorithm for scoring abnormal performance on clock drawing test (CDT). Specifically, “The CDT is considered normal if all the numbers are present in the correct sequence and position, and the hands readably display the requested time.” [52].

bAbnormal Trails B result defined as completion time of >3 min or ≥3 errors [53]. n=120 cases included the Trails B data.