Table 2.
With IER (n = 104) |
Without IER (n = 76) |
|
---|---|---|
Interradicular distance increased | 62.50% | 63.16% |
Interradicular distance decreased | 37.50% | 36.84% |
IER interproximal enamel reduction
With IER (n = 104) |
Without IER (n = 76) |
|
---|---|---|
Interradicular distance increased | 62.50% | 63.16% |
Interradicular distance decreased | 37.50% | 36.84% |
IER interproximal enamel reduction