Table 7.
Multivariate negative binomial models of associations and interactions between Anopheles abundances, presence of small-scale agriculture, and urbanicity measures
| An. arabiensis | An. funestus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% CI | P value | 95% CI | P value | |
| Model 1c | ||||
| Agriculture | 3.8 (2.3, 6.2) | < .0001 | 2.7 (1.7, 4.2) | < .0001 |
| Within city limits | 0.1 (0, 0.2) | < .0001 | 0.02 (0.01, 0.05) | < .0001 |
| Agriculturea within city limits | 3.4 (1.2, 9.6) | 0.02 | 1.0 (0.4, 2.8) | 1.00 |
| Model 2c | ||||
| Agriculture | 15.6 (5.4, 45.2) | < .0001 | 8.2 (2.9, 23.8) | < .0001 |
| Increasing distance | 1.6 (1.4, 1.8) | < .0001 | 1.7 (1.5, 2.0) | < .0001 |
| Agriculturea increasing distance | 0.8 (0.7, 1.0) | 0.04 | 0.8 (0.7, 1.0) | 0.07 |
| Model 3c | ||||
| Agriculture | 5.3 (2.7, 10.5) | <.0001 | 4.2 (2.0, 8.9) | 0.0001 |
| Housing density | 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) | 0.02 | 0.3 (0.2, 0.6) | < 0.001 |
| Agriculturea house densitya | 1.0 (0.5, 2.2) | 0.91 | 0.8 (0.3, 2.0) | 0.65 |
Italic values indicate significance of p value (p < 0.05)
aUnits are an additional 10 households within a 50 m radius of the sampled household