Table 3.

Summary of within-study pairwise comparisons of availability versus accessibility measures

Pairwise comparison	Total	Measure with greatest effect size (percentage of total)
Count versus proximity	100	Count (75%)
Count road network buffer Proximity road network distance	78	Count road network buffer (77%)
Count Euclidean buffer Proximity road network distance	19	Count Euclidean buffer (79%)
Count road network buffer Proximity Euclidean distance	3	Proximity Euclidean distance (100%)
Presence versus proximity	23	Presence (74%)
Presence road network buffer Proximity road network distance	12	Presence road network buffer (100%)
Presence Euclidean buffer Proximity road network distance	7	Presence Euclidean buffer (71%)
Presence Euclidean buffer Proximity Euclidean distance	4	Proximity Euclidean distance (100%)
Continuous density versus proximity	18	Continuous density (89%)
Proximity road network distance Euclidean kernel density estimation	18	Euclidean kernel density estimation (89%)
Relative density versus proximity	25	Density Euclidean buffer/10,000 population (76%)
Density Euclidean buffer/10,000 population Proximity Euclidean distance	18	Density Euclidean buffer/10,000 population (67%)
Density Euclidean buffer/10,000 population Proximity road network distance	7	Proximity road network distance (100%)
Relative density versus average proximity	7	Average proximity (100%)
Density Euclidean buffer/10,000 population Average proximity road network distance	7	Average proximity road network distance (100%)
Variety versus proximity	2	Variety and proximity (50%)
Variety road network buffer Proximity road network distance	2	50%
RFEI versus proximity	1	Proximity (100%)
RFEI Euclidean buffer Proximity road network distance	1	Proximity road network distance (100%)

Dunn (2012) [43] did not report on the technique used to determine proximity, count within a 1 mile buffer, and count within a 3 mile buffer. Therefore, these associations (n = 3) were excluded from the table