Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2018 Apr 21;127:110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.006

Table 5.

Associations Between Meal Characteristic and Parent Restriction and Food Pressuring at Meal Occasions (n=3,878 meal occasions including snacks)*

Outcome: Restriction Outcome: Pressuring
Predicted Probability Predicted Probability
Meal Characteristic Predictor (95% CI) P Value (95% CI) P Value
Meal Type
 Homemade 0.10 (0.08, 0.14)a <0.001 0.19 (0.16, 0.23)b <0.001
 Pre-Prepared 0.12 (0.09, 0.16)ab 0.11 (0.08, 0.15)a
 Pre-Prepared + Homemade 0.12 (0.08, 0.17)ab 0.16 (0.11, 0.22)ab
 Fast Food 0.15 (0.11, 0.20)b 0.11 (0.08, 0.16)a
 Fast Food + Homemade 0.34 (0.21, 0.49)d 0.43 (0.28, 0.60)c
 Fast-Food + Pre-Prepared 0.13 (0.03, 0.38)abc 0.05 (0.00, 0.51)ab
 Fast Food+ Pre-Prepared + Homemade 0.35 (0.19, 0.56)cd 0.21 (0.10, 0.4)ab
Number of Children Present
 Target child 0.13 (0.09, 0.18)ab 0.880 0.12 (0.09, 0.17)a 0.363
 Two children 0.11 (0.08, 0.14)a 0.16 (0.13, 0.20)b
 Three children 0.11 (0.08, 0.16)ab 0.16 (0.12, 0.21)ab
 Four children or more 0.14 (0.10, 0.19)b 0.17 (0.13, 0.21)b
Composition of Children Attending the Meal
 Only child present 0.13 (0.09, 0.18)a 0.696 0.12 (0.09, 0.16)a 0.054
 Child and siblings 0.12 (0.09, 0.15)a 0.17 (0.14, 0.21)b
 Child, siblings, and other kids 0.13 (0.09, 0.18)a 0.12 (0.08, 0.16)a
Number of Adults Attending the Meal
 Parent 0.11 (0.09, 0.15)a 0.033 0.14 (0.11, 0.18)a 0.298
 Parent + another adult 0.11 (0.08, 0.15)a 0.17 (0.14, 0.22)b
 Parent + 2 or more adults 0.16 (0.12, 0.21)b 0.16 (0.12, 0.21)ab
Composition of Adults Attending the Meal
 Parent 0.11 (0.09, 0.15)a 0.148 0.14 (0.11, 0.18)a 0.266
 Parent and caregiver 0.12 (0.09, 0.16)a 0.16 (0.13, 0.20)ab
 Parent, adult family, and non-family adults 0.13 (0.09, 0.17)a 0.18 (0.14, 0.23)b
Who Prepared the Meal
 Parent 0.11 (0.08, 0.15)a 0.048 0.16 (0.13, 0.20)a 0.144
 Partner (e.g. spouse) 0.16 (0.11, 0.23)b 0.15 (0.11, 0.21)a
 Child participant only 0.10 (0.06, 0.16)ab 0.07 (0.04, 0.13)b
 Child participant + parent/partner 0.12 (0.07, 0.18)ab 0.15 (0.09, 0.22)a
Other source ( e.g., fast food, restaurant, another adult) 0.13 (0.10, 0.17)ab 0.17 (0.13, 0.21)a
Meal Setting
 Around a table or counter at home 0.12 (0.09, 0.16)ab 0.022 0.17 (0.14, 0.21)b 0.006
 On couch/chair in living area at home 0.10 (0.07, 0.15)a 0.14 (0.10, 0.18)a
 Scattered throughout house or standing up 0.16 (0.11, 0.22)b 0.13 (0.09, 0.19)ab
 Out of home (e.g. in the car, restaurant, other) 0.11 (0.07, 0.16)ab 0.11 (0.07, 0.16)a
What Influenced Decisions to Prepare the Meal
 Child/family likes or requested 0.11 (0.08, 0.15)b 0.053 0.13 (0.10, 0.17)ab 0.003
 Desire to avoid conflict with child or a family fight 0.06 (0.02, 0.13)a 0.14 (0.07, 0.24)abcd
 It was a healthy option 0.16 (0.12, 0.22)c 0.17 (0.13, 0.23)bcd
 It was a planned meal 0.10 (0.06, 0.14)ab 0.18 (0.14, 0.24)cd
 Available where we ate (e.g., home or restaurant) 0.13 (0.10, 0.18)bc 0.22 (0.17, 0.27)d
 Quick and easy to make 0.13 (0.09, 0.18)abc 0.16 (0.12, 0.21)a
 Stressful day, busy schedule, or too tired to cook 0.13 (0.08, 0.21)bc 0.16 (0.11, 0.24)bc
 Other 0.13 (0.07, 0.24)bc 0.09 (0.04, 0.18)abcd
Activity During the Meal
 Conversation only 0.11 (0.08, 0.15)a 0.123 0.16 (0.13, 0.20)a 0.503
 Screentime and other distractions 0.13 (0.09, 0.18)a 0.17 (0.12, 0.22)a
 Combination and other distractions 0.13 (0.10, 0.18)a 0.16 (0.12, 0.20)a
 None of the above 0.13 (0.09, 0.19)a 0.13 (0.09, 0.19)a
Overall Atmosphere of the Meal
 Relaxed 0.11 (0.08, 0.15)a 0.015 0.13 (0.10, 0.17)a 0.496
 Neutral 0.10 (0.06, 0.14)a 0.21 (0.16, 0.27)b
 Enjoyable 0.13 (0.10, 0.17)ab 0.15 (0.12, 0.19)a
 Tense 0.15 (0.08, 0.26)ab 0.16 (0.09, 0.27)ab
 Chaotic 0.17 (0.12, 0.25)b 0.16 (0.10, 0.24)ab
 Rushed 0.11 (0.06, 0.19)ab 0.15 (0.10, 0.24)ab
*

Models adjusted for: parent sex and age, child sex and age, household race, child weight status, parent weight status, and household income

Pairwise comparisons that share a letter are not signiicantly different at p <0.05

Interpretation Example: Meal type (i.e., homemade, fast food, and preprepared) was statistically predictive of restriction at the meal (P<0.001). The probability of parent restriction was highest when fast food was combined with homemade and pre-prepared meals (0.35, 95% CI: (0.19, 0.56)) and lowest when the meal contained only homemade food (0.10, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.14).