Table 3.
Results of post hoc comparisons between groups in five dependent variables.
| Dependent Variables | Between Groups | F | df | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Processing Speed (TN) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | .925 | 1 | .340 |
| CBPA vs. Control | 6.876 | 1 | .010 | |
| Fitbit-O vs. Control | 1.842 | 1 | .178 | |
|
| ||||
| Focused Attention (TN-E) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | 1.73 | 1 | .194 |
| CBPA vs. Control | 10.688 | 1 | .002 | |
| Fitbit-O vs. Control | 1.874 | 1 | .175 | |
|
| ||||
| Concentration performance (CP) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | 24.162 | 1 | .000 |
| CBPA vs. Control | 26.454 | 1 | .000 | |
| Fitbit-O vs. Control | .001 | 1 | .976 | |
|
| ||||
| Accuracy (Error %) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | .538 | 1 | .466 |
| CBPA vs. Control | .297 | 1 | .587 | |
| Fitbit-O vs. Control | .001 | 1 | .976 | |
|
| ||||
| Attention Span (FR) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | 6.891 | 1 | .011 |
| CBPA vs. Control | 14.090 | 1 | .000 | |
| Fitbit-O vs. Control | 0.568 | 1 | .453 | |