Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 4;9:1228. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01228

Table 1.

Pivotal clinical trials evaluating daratumumab.

Study name (reference) Number of patients Patient population Response Adverse events
GEN 501
Phase I/II daratumumab monotherapy (4)
32 patients in dose escalation
72 patients in cohort expansion
RRMM patients mostly refractory to bortezomib or lenalidomide with a median of four prior lines of treatment 16 mg/kg cohort ORR of 36%.
8 mg/kg cohort ORR of 10%.
Median PFS in the 16 mg/kg cohort was 5.6 months. 65% of responding patients had not progressed after 12 months of follow-up.
No MTD in phase I (dose escalation up to 24 mg/kg)
Daratumumab administration was safe with mostly mild grade 1–2 IRRs predominantly occurring during the first infusion. Most prominent IRRs were rhinitis, cough, or dyspnea.

SIRIUS
Phase II daratumumab monotherapy (5)
124 patients
18 patients: 8 mg/kg
106 patients: 16 mg/kg
RRMM patients mostly refractory to bortezomib or lenalidomide with a median of five prior lines of treatment 16 mg/kg cohort ORR of 29% and median PFS was 3.7 months with a 1-year OS of 65%.
8 mg/kg cohort ORR 11%.
Similar to the GEN501 study, the most prominent side effects were IRRs of grade 1 or grade 2.

GEN 503
Phase I/II daratumumab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (13)
13 patients in dose escalation
32 patients in cohort expansion (16 mg/kg)
RRMM patients with a median of two prior lines of therapy ORR was 84% in phase I and 81% in phase II with a total of 13 sCR, 3 CR, 13 VGPR, and 8 PR.
In phase II, the 18-month PFS was 72% and OS was 90%.
Grade 3–4 adverse events (≥5%) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia.
IRRs occurred in 56% of patients after the first infusion.

POLLUX
Phase III Lenalidomide + dexamethasone ± daratumumab (9)
569 patients.
286 in the DRd group and 283 in the control group
RRMM patients with a median of one prior line of therapy. Higher ORR in the DRd group than in the control group (92.9% versus 76.4%).
The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the daratumumab group versus the control group was 0.37.
In the DRd group the MRD-negative rate at 10−5 was 22.4% versus 4.6% in the Rd group.
Neutropenia grade 3 or 4 in 51.9% of the patients in the DRd group versus 37% in the control group.
IRRs of grade 1 or 2 severity in 47.7% of the patients in the DRd group.

CASTOR
Phase III bortezomib + dexamethasone ± daratumumab (10)
498 patients.
251 in the DVd group and 247 in the control group
RRMM patients with a median of two prior lines of therapy. Higher ORR in the DVd group than in the control group (82.9% versus 63.2%).
The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the DVd group versus the control group was 0.39.
In the DVd group, the MRD-negative rate at 10−5 was 12 versus 2% in the control group.
|Thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 in 45.3% of the patients in the DVd group versus 32.9% in the control group. Neutropenia grade 3–4 was 12.8% for DVd versus 4.2% for Vd.
|Daratumumab-related IRRs (mostly of grade 1 or 2) occurred in 45.3% of the patients, with the majority occurring during the first infusion.

EQUULEUS
Phase Ib daratumumab + pomalidomide and dexamethasone (blood 130, Suppl. 1, 510)
103 patients RRMM patients with a median of four prior lines of therapy. ORR was 60%, median PFS 8.8 months and median OS 17.5 months.
Out of 17 patients with CR or sCR, 29% were MRD negative by NGS at 10−5.
Neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia were the most common side effects and considered to be mainly caused by pomalidomide.
IRRs occurred in 50% of patients and mainly during the first infusion. One case of laryngeal edema occurred during the second infusion.

ALCYONE
Phase III melphalan + prednisolon + bortezomib ± daratumumab (11)
706 patients
350 in the D-MPV group and 356 in the control group
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. ORR in the D-MPV group was 90.9 versus 73.9% in the control group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the D-MPV group versus the control group was 0.5. In the D-MPV group, the MRD negative rate at 10−5 was 22.3 versus 6.2% in the MPV group. Infections grade 3 or 4 in 23.1% of the patients in the D-MPV group versus 14.7% in the control group.
Daratumumab-related IRRs (mostly of grade 1 or 2) occurred in 27.7% of the patients, with the majority during the first infusion.

RRMM, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; IRR, infusion-related reactions; MRD, minimal residual disease.