Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;9(2):186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.005

Table 2.

Details of 15 patients with their outcome in Schatzker VI fractures.

SL No Age Sex Side Sost tissue status Fixator (weeks)
Full wt Bearing (wk) Follow-up (months) Time to union (wk) Range of Motion (degrees) Outcome Complication
Femoral Tibial
1 36 M L Blister No 12 15 24 14 120 Excellent No
2 39 M R Open 4 13 16 18 15 120 Excellent No
3 53 M L Open 6 16 20 30 24 70 Fair Stiffness
4 63 M L Blister 4 13 17 18 16 100 Good Pin tract infection
5 48 F R Open 4 14 17 18 15 120 Excellent Pin tract infection
6 44 M L Blister 4 13 16 24 13 130 Excellent No
7 37 M R Open 4 14 17 16 14 100 Good Varus deformity
8 27 M L Open 6 18 22 16 16 100 Good No
9 50 M L Blister No 12 15 15 13 120 Excellent No
10 25 M R Open 4 16 17 20 14 120 Excellent No
11 60 M L Blister 4 13 17 18 13 100 Good No
12 45 F R Open 4 14 17 18 15 120 Good No
13 42 M L Blister 4 13 16 24 13 130 Excellent No
14 33 M R Open 4 14 17 16 12 100 Good No
15 31 M L Open 6 18 22 16 12 100 Good No